T Violation in Four Flavour Neutrino Oscillation in Planck Scale

Bipin Singh Koranga* and Agam Kumar Jha

Department of Physics, Kirori Mal College (University of Delhi), Delhi-110007, India
E-mail: bipiniitb@rediffmail.com
*Corresponding Author

Received 27 August 2022; Accepted 03 September 2022; Publication 06 October 2022

Abstract

The Planck scale effects have been studied in the four flavour, we discuss the Planck scale effects in the four flavour neutrino sector on the asymmetry between T-conjugate oscillation probabilities. ΔPT=P(να→νβ)-P(νβ→να), for four flavor framework. In this paper, we also discuss some aspect of T violation effects in four flavor neutrino oscillation above the GUT scale.

Keywords: T violation, four flavor mixing.

1 Introduction

The deficit of neutrinos flux suggested the tiny mass of neutrins. Neutrinos are not massless and mixing in the lepton sector, this indicates that there is T/CP violation. Three flavour neutrino oscillation probability in general depends on six parameter three mixing angles θ13,θ12,θ23, one CP violating phase δ and two independent mass square difference Δ21 and Δ31, The current best fit value of neutrino mixing angle and mass square difference from the neutrino experiments to be s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ14=0.019, Δ41=1.70 eV2 [1]. In search of neutrino oscillation, we have obtained the three mass square difference △⁢msun2≪△⁢matm2≪△⁢mLSND2 from atmospheric, solar neutrino and LSND collabration [2, 3, 4, 5]. Earlier study of T and CP violation for neutrinos have been given by [6, 7]. In this article, we will discuss the possible violation of Time reversal symmetry in four flavour neutrino oscillation. Four Flavour Neutrino Mixing beyond the GUT scale region in Section 2. In Section 3 give the Time reversal symmetry beyond the GUT scale. In Section 4, give the conclusions.

2 Planck Scale Effects in Four Flavour Neutrino Mixing

Neutrino mass squared differences and mixing angles beyond the GUT scale are studieded in earlier paper [8, 9, 10]. Mass matrix M of neutrino is given by

M=U*⁢diag⁢(Mi)⁢U†, (1)

where, Mi, is the neutrino masses and Uα⁢i is the usual mixing. Few of the parameters related to neutrino oscillation are known, the major expectation is given by the mixing elements U.

In term of the above mixing angles, the mixing matrix is

U =diag⁢(ei⁢f⁢1,ei⁢f⁢2,ei⁢f⁢3,ei⁢f⁢4)⁢R⁢(θ34)⁢R⁢(θ24)⁢Δ⁢R⁢(θ14)
=R⁢(θ13)⁢R⁢(θ12)⁢Δ*⁢R⁢(θ23)⁢diag⁢(ei⁢α,ei⁢β,ei⁢γ,1). (2)

The Dirac phase associates with the matrix Δ=diag(ei⁢δ2,1,1,e-i⁢δ2). This leads to T/CP violation in neutrino oscillation α, β and γ are the Majorana phases, which effects the neutrinoless double beta decay. f1, f2, f3and f4 are the charged mixing angle in the charge lepton field. New mixing matrix beyond the GUT scale is given as [8, 9, 10]

U′=U⁢(1+i⁢δ⁢θ), (3)

where δ⁢θ is the form of hermition matrix, the first order neutrino mass square difference Δ⁢Mi⁢j′, given by

Δ⁢Mi⁢j′⁣2=Δ⁢Mi⁢j2+2.0⁢(-Mj⁢R⁢e⁢(mj⁢j)+Mi⁢R⁢e⁢(mi⁢i)), (4)
m=μ⁢Ut⁢λ⁢U, (5)

and

μ=v2Mp⁢l.

The changed mixing matrix is

δ⁢θi⁢j=-I⁢m⁢(mi⁢j)⁢(Mi-Mj)+R⁢e⁢(mi⁢j)⁢(Mi+Mj)Δ⁢Mi⁢j′⁣2. (6)

Using Equation (3), we can compute four flavour neutrino mixing angles [11] as,

s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ14′ =|Us4′|2, (7)
sin2⁢θ24′ =|Ue′⁢4′|21-|Us4′|2, (8)
s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′ =|Uμ⁢4′|21-|Us4′|2-|Us4′|2, (9)
sin2⁢θ13′ =|Us3′|21-|Us4′|2, (10)
s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′ =|Us2′|21-|Us4′|2-|Us3′|2, (11)
s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ23′ =|Ue3′|2⁢(1-|Us4′|2)-(|Us4′|2⁢|Ue4′|2)1-|Us4′|2-|Ue4′|2
 +|Us⁢1′⁢Ue⁢1′+Us⁢2′⁢Ue⁢2′|2⁢(1-|Us⁢4′|2)(1-|Us⁢4′|2-|Us⁢3′|2)⁢(1-|Us⁢4′|2-|Ue⁢4′|2). (12)

where,

Uα⁢1′ =Uα⁢1+∑iUα⁢i(-R⁢e⁢(mi⁢1)⁢(Mi+M1)-i⁢I⁢m⁢(mi⁢1)⁢(Mi-M1)Mi2-M12+2(MiRe(mi⁢i)-M1Re(m11).),
Uα⁢2′ =Uα⁢2+∑iUα⁢i(-R⁢e⁢(mi⁢2)⁢(Mi+M2)-i⁢I⁢m⁢(mi⁢2)⁢(Mi-M2)Mi2-M22+2(MiRe(mi⁢i)-M4Re(m22).),
Uα⁢3′ =Uα⁢3+∑iUα⁢i(-R⁢e⁢(mi⁢3)⁢(Mi+M3)-i⁢I⁢m⁢(mi⁢3)⁢(Mi-M3)Mi2-M32+2(MiRe(mi⁢i)-M4Re(m33).),
Uα⁢4′ =Uα⁢4+∑iUα⁢i(-Re⁢(mi4)⁢(Mi+M4)-iIm⁢(mi4)⁢(Mi-M4)Mi2-M42+2(MiRe(mii)-M4Re(m44).),
  ⁢α=s,e,μ,τ

3 Time Reversal Symmetry due to Planck Scale Effects for Four Flavour Mixing

As far on T violation effects in four flavour framework, we find that a comparison of να→νβ and νβ→να oscillation probability. Time reversal symmetry is violated, if

ΔPα⁢βT=P(να→νβ)-P(νβ→να)≠0, (13)

and

(α,β)=(e,μ),(μ,τ),(τ,e).

P(να→νβ) and P(νβ→να) is oscillation probabilities.

CP violation effects in neutrino oscillations, we find that a comparison of neutrino oscillation να→νβ and να¯→νβ¯ anti-neutrino oscillation probability. CP symmetry is violated, if

ΔPα⁢βC⁢P=P(να→νβ)-P(να¯→νβ¯)≠0. (14)

and

(α,β)=(e,μ),(μ,τ),(τ,e).

Δ⁢Pα⁢βT and Δ⁢Pα⁢βC⁢P defined in Equations (13) and (14) are equal and given by

Δ⁢Pα⁢βT=Δ⁢Pα⁢βC⁢P=16⁢J⁢(s⁢i⁢n⁢Δ21⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢Δ32⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢Δ31). (15)

here

Δi⁢j=1.27⁢(Δi⁢je⁢V2)⁢(LK⁢m)⁢(1⁢G⁢e⁢VE), (16)

Δi⁢j=(mi2-mj2) is neutrino mass square difference, L is baseline length, E is energy and J is the Jarlskog determinant [13] is given by

J =I⁢m⁢(Ue⁢1⁢Ue⁢2*⁢Uμ⁢1*⁢Uμ⁢2)
=18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢δ, (17)

Let us compute Δ⁢Pα⁢βT and Δ⁢Pα⁢βC⁢P for mixing U′=U⁢(1+i⁢δ⁢θ).

Δ′⁢Pα⁢βT=Δ′⁢Pα⁢βC⁢P=16⁢J′⁢(s⁢i⁢n⁢Δ21′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢Δ32′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢Δ31′), (18)

where J′ is the Jarlskog determiant for new mixing is given by [13]

J′ =I⁢m⁢(Ue⁢1′⁢Ue⁢2*′⁢Uμ⁢1*′⁢Uμ⁢2′)
=Im(Ue⁢1Ue⁢2*Uμ⁢1*Uμ⁢2)+Im(i(Uμ⁢1Uμ⁢2)(|Ue⁢2|2δθ12*+Ue⁢2Ue⁢3δθ13
 -|Ue⁢1|2δθ12*-Ue⁢1Ue⁢3*δθ23*)+Im(i(Ue⁢1*Ue⁢2)(|Uμ⁢1|2δθ12
 +Uμ⁢1*Uμ⁢3δθ23*-|Uμ⁢2|2δθ12-Uμ⁢2Uμ⁢3*δθ13)
=J+Δ⁢J

The calculation of J Jarlskog determiant [12] for four flavour neutrino oscilation due to Planck scale region. which is given by replacing the neutrino matrix U by new neutrino matrix U′,

Js⁢e13′ =Im((Us⁢1+i∑iUs⁢iδθi⁢1)(Ue⁢3+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢3)
 ×(Us⁢3*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢3*)(Ue⁢1*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢1*))
Js⁢e24′ =Im((Us⁢2+i∑iUs⁢iδθi⁢2)(Ue⁢4+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢4)
 ×(Us⁢4*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢4*)(Ue⁢2*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢2*))
Js⁢e34′ =Im((Us⁢3+i∑iUs⁢iδθi⁢3)(Ue⁢4+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢4)
 ×(Us⁢4*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢4*)(Ue⁢3*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢3*))
Jτ⁢s13′ =Im((Uτ⁢1+i∑iUτ⁢iδθi⁢1)(Us⁢3+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢3)
 ×(Uτ⁢3*-i∑iUτ⁢i*δθi⁢1*)(Us⁢1*-i∑iUs⁢i*δθi⁢1*))
Jτ⁢s14′ =Im((Uτ⁢1+i∑iUτ⁢iδθi⁢1)(Us⁢4+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢4)
 (Uτ⁢4*-i∑iUτ⁢i*δθi⁢4*)(Us⁢1*-i∑iUs⁢i*δθi⁢1*))
Jτ⁢s34′ =Im((Uτ⁢3+i∑iUτ⁢iδθi⁢3)(Us⁢4+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢4)
 (Uτ⁢4*-i∑iUτ⁢i*δθi⁢4*)(Us⁢3*-i∑iUs⁢i*δθi⁢3*))
Je⁢μ23′ =Im((Ue⁢2+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢2)(Uμ⁢3+i∑iUμ⁢iδθi⁢3)
 ×(Ue⁢3*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢3*)(Uμ⁢2*-i∑iUμ⁢i*δθi⁢2*))
Je⁢μ24′ =Im((Ue⁢2+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢2)(Uμ⁢4+i∑iUμ⁢iδθi⁢4)
 ×(Ue⁢4*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢4*)(Uμ⁢2*-i∑iUμ⁢i*δθi⁢2*))
Je⁢μ34′ =Im((Ue⁢3+i∑iUe⁢iδθi⁢3)(Uμ⁢4+i∑iUμ⁢iδθi⁢4)
 ×(Ue⁢4*-i∑iUe⁢i*δθi⁢4*)(Uμ⁢3*-i∑iUμ⁢i*δθi⁢3*)) (19)

In term of mixing angle and Dirac phases, we can write Jarlskog determinant Jα⁢βi⁢j′ due to Planck scale are,

Js⁢e13′ =116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θy
 -116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θz
 +18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ12′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz) (20)
Js⁢e24′ =18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θy
 +14⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz)
Js⁢e34′ =18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz) (22)
Jτ⁢s13′ =18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ12′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θx
 +116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θy
 +18⁢(c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ24′-s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′)
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θz
 -18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy)
 -116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx+θz)
 +18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ12′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz)
 -18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ23′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy+θz) (23)
Jτ⁢s14′ =-18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ12′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θx
 -18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θy
 -18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx+θz)
 -18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ12′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz) (24)
Jτ⁢s34′ =18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θx
 +18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz) (25)
Je⁢μ23′ =-14(cos2θ12′cos2θ23′sin2θ24′-cos2θ12′cos2θ24′sin2θ23′
 +s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ24′
 +sin2θ12′sin2θ23′)sin2θ13′sin2θ34′sinθ14′cosθ23′cosθ24′sinθx
 +14(cos2θ13′cos2θ34′sin2θ23′-cos2θ23′cos2θ34′sin2θ13′
 +s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′
 -sin2θ34′sin2θ23′)sin2θ12′sin2θ24′sinθ14′cosθ13′cosθ23′cosθ24′sinθy
 +18(cos2θ24′cos2θ34′-cos2θ24′sin2θ14′sin2θ34′
 -cos2θ34′sin2θ14′sin2θ24′+sin2θ14′sin2θ24′sin2θ34′)
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θz
 +14⁢(s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ13′-c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ13′)⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′
 ×c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy)
 +14(cos2θ23′-sin2θ24′cos2θ13′-cos2θ24′sin2θ13′
 +sin2θ13′sin2θ14′sin2θ24′)
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx+θz)
 -14(cos2θ12′cos2θ23′cos2θ34′-cos2θ12′cos2θ23′sin2θ34′
 -c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′+s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′
 -sin2θ12′sin2θ23′sin2θ34′)sin2θ13′sin2θ24′sinθ14′sinθ23′sin(θy-θz)
 +14(cos2θ12′cos2θ13′cos2θ24′-cos2θ12′cos2θ24′sin2θ13′sin2θ14′
 -cos2θ13′cos2θ24′sin2θ12′sin2θ14′+cos2θ24′sin2θ12′sin2θ13′sin2θ14′)
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy+θz)
 -14(cos2θ13′cos2θ24′sin2θ23′-cos2θ13′sin2θ23′sin2θ24′sin2θ14′
 -cos2θ24′sin2θ23′sin2θ13′sin2θ14′)
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy+2⁢θz)
 -116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ14′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx+θy)
 +116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θz)
 +18⁢(c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ34′-s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′)⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ12′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-2⁢θz)
 -18⁢(c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ12′-s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′)⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ24′
 ×c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-2⁢θy+2⁢θz)
 -18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ12′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ14′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-2⁢θy+θz)
 +116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ23′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-2⁢θy+3⁢θz) (26)
Je⁢μ24′ =116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θx
 +18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θx
 -14⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ23′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ13′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy)
 +116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx+θy)
 -18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′
 ×s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz)
 +18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ23′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy+2⁢θz)
 -14⁢(c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ12′-s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ12′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ13′)⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ34′
 ×c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θx-θy+θz) (27)
Je⁢μ34′ =-116⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ34′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ24′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θx
 +18⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ13′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ14′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n2⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θy-θz)
 +14⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ23′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢2⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ13′⁢c⁢o⁢s2⁢θ14′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ24′⁢c⁢o⁢s⁢θ34′
 ×s⁢i⁢n⁢θ34′⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(θz+θx-θy) (28)
θx =δ14-(δ13+δ34)
θy =δ14-(δ12+δ24)
θz =δ13-(δ12+δ23) (29)

4 Conclusions

We discussed some importance of T violation in four flavour neutrino oscillation beyond the GUT scale. We have presented four flavour neutrino mixing and possible T violation term Δ′⁢Pα⁢βT above the GUT scale. In four flavour neutrino oscillation above the GUT scale region [10]. The mixing angle changes in θ14,θ24 and θ34 above the GUT scale, are very small. But the change in θ23 is very large for large range of values of the majaorona phases α,β and γ. In four flavour mixing gives the range of mixing angle θ12′=θ12±3.0∘, θ12′=θ12±45∘ [12] modified mass square difference Δ21′=Δ21±(1.0+0.5)×10-5 eV2 [10], for Planck scale Mp⁢l≈2.0×1019 GeV. In this study, beyond the GUT scale region, we have obtained, solar mixing angle θ12, atmoshpheric angle θ23 and solar neutrino mass square difference Δ21′ are more effective for Time Reversal symmetry violation. We would like to conclude that in planck scale region, two mixing angle θ12, θ23 and solar mass square difference Δ21′ will more effective for Time Reversal symmetry violation.

References

[1] S. Gariazzo et al., JHEP 1706, 135 (2017).

[2] V. Barger, K. Whisnant, R.J.N. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett, 2084 (1980).

[3] SNO Collaboration, B. Aharmim et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 045502 (2007).

[4] Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, J. Hosaka, et al., Phys. Rev. D 74, 32002 (2006).

[5] T2K Collaboration, Y. Itow F. Ardellier et al., arXiv:hep-ex/0106019.

[6] N. Cabibbo, Phys. Lett. B 72, 333 (1978).

[7] V. Barger, K. Whisnant, R.J.N. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2084 (1980).

[8] B.S. Koranga, S. Uma Sankara, M. Narayan, Phys. Letts. B 665, 63–66 (2008).

[9] F. Vissani et al., Phys. Lett. B571, 209, (2003).

[10] Bipin Singh Koranga, Mod. Phys. Lett. A25, 1–6 (2010).

[11] B.S. Koranga, V.K. Nautiyal, A.K. Jha, M. Narayan, Int. J. Theor. Phys. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-021-04811-2.

[12] Bipin Singh Koranga and S. Uma Sankar, Electron. J. Theor. Phys. 5, 1–6 (2009).

[13] B.S. Koranga and V.K. Nautiyal, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 60, 3548–3565, 9 (2021).

Biographies

Bipin Singh Koranga is an Associate Professor in the Department of Physics, Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi. He has been with the Theoretical Physics Group, IIT Bombay since 2001 and received the Ph.D. degree in physics (neutrino masses and mixings) from the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay in 2007. He has been teaching basic courses in physics and mathematical Physics at the graduate level for the last 15 years. His research interests include the origin of universe, physics beyond the standard model, theoretical nuclear physics, quantum mechanical neutrino oscillation and few topics related to astrology. He has published over 50 scientific papers in various International Journals and three book in international publishers. His present research interest includes the neutrino mass models and related phenomenology. He is also a life member of Indian Physics Society.

Agam Kumar Jha is an Associate Professor in the Department of Physics, Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi. He earned his Ph.D. degree in physics (High Energy Particle Physics) from University of Delhi, Delhi. He has been teaching basic courses in Physics at graduate and postgraduate level for the last 18 years. He has published several scientific papers in various international journals of repute and also presented his works at national and international conferences. His research interests include the Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) and Neutrino Physics.

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Planck Scale Effects in Four Flavour Neutrino Mixing

3 Time Reversal Symmetry due to Planck Scale Effects for Four Flavour Mixing

4 Conclusions

References

Biographies