Changing Outlook on Harnessing Biodiversity Values – A Special Focus on Indian Himalaya
Ranbeer S. Rawal, Vikram S. Negi and Indra D. Bhatt*
G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment (NIHE), Kosi-Katarmal, Uttarakhand, India
E-mail: id_bhatt@yahoo.com
*Corresponding Authors
Received 07 February 2021; Accepted 27 February 2021; Publication 31 May 2021
The Himalaya, as provider of goods and range of ecosystem services, is vital for sustaining life of millions of people in uplands and billions in lowlands. Indian National Action Plan on Climate Change has recognized the region vital for ecological security of the country. However, growing demand for bio-resources, combined with inadequate appreciation for values of goods and services provided by Himalayan biodiversity, has led to the unsustainable use of these resources, leading to environmental degradation in the region. The paper also looks into the scenario as to how recent pandemic of COVID 19 has brought increased focus of people on bio-resources of the region. More importantly it has suggested conservation and sustainable utilization of biodiversity to ensure for sustaining the continuous flow of ecosystem services and goods. Biodiversity in the region provides several opportunities, however, under changing scenario, we need to think afresh and differently on possibilities of finding better and optimal livelihood options, and the issues of conservation in the region. In this context, larger focus on conservation education has been stressed as a way forward. This paper attempts to build a case for the biodiversity in Indian Himalayan Region through a SWOT assessment. Certain cases have been elaborated wherein the outlook has changed to harness the values.
Keywords: Biodiversity conservation, medicinal plants, restoration, traditional crops, wild edibles.
Mountains, which cover over 22% of total global land surface, harbor nearly a quarter of world’s forests, and provide a range of ecosystem services to at least half of humankind (Spehn et al., 2010). They are home to 50% of global biodiversity hotspots, which support approximately one-quarter of world’s terrestrial biological diversity (Spehn et al., 2010). In addition, these regions are important source of agro-diversity including locally adapted crop varieties: an asset for assuring food security. The significant role of mountain ecosystem services towards sustaining global population has gained popularity among scientists, policy makers and natural resource managers who have increasingly become interested for sustaining the mountain ecosystem services in the future (Chettri and Sharma 2016).
Among the world’s mountain’s, Asia has the largest, highest and most populated mountain systems – the Himalaya. This mountain holds a special identity among mountains across the world by being young, massive, and diverse. Especially the unparallel vertical gradient accompanied by its geo-dynamism makes the Himalaya most complex and highly variable. This region forms a diverse geographic and ecological entity endowed with overwhelming richness, representativeness and uniqueness of biodiversity.
The Himalaya acts as a store house of snow and ice, largest outside the two poles. Being provider of large volumes of freshwater, Himalaya is popularly described as ‘The Third Pole’ of the world (Chettri and Sharma 2016). Ten major rivers of the world, originate from this region, and drain large part of Asia making it a crucial ecological entity (Desai et al., 2011).This region is known for its unique flora and fauna, and listed among the ‘Mega Biodiversity Hot Spot’ areas. High degree of endemism in the region implies occurrence of various critical habitats and eco-regions having global importance. It is estimated that 210 million people in the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH) and 1.3 billion peoples in downstream benefits from food and energy services of Himalaya (Sharma 2017).
The Indian Himalayan Region (IHR) contributes for a large proportion of the Himalayan biodiversity. IHR greatly matters for the ecological and economic security of India. While the region represents nearly 4% of total human population of the country, it exhibits diversity of ethnic groups (30%; 171 out of a total 573 reported scheduled tribes in India).The diversity of biophysical features in IHR is adequately represented through 3 bio-geographical zones (Trans-Himalaya, Himalaya and North-East) and 9 bio-geographic provinces (33% of India). The great wealth of biological diversity in the region is attributed to the wide variety of bio-physical conditions across the IHR. It extends over 9 states fully (Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya), 02 states partially (hilly districts of Assam, and West Bengal) and 02 Union Territories fully (Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh). In the context of India, IHR represents about 4% of the total population (48.6 million), 16.2% of the total geographical area (5,33,604 km), 30% of the total ethnic group’s (170); 36% of the total forest cover (2,50,708 km), 44% of the total biodiversity, 63% of the total water flow budget and 100% of the alpine and glacial systems (Rawal et al., 2013)
The IHR is represented with rich floral diversity i.e., about 8,000 species of angiosperm (40% endemic), 44 species of gymnosperm (16% endemic), 600 species of Pteridophytes (25% endemic), 1737 species of bryophytes (33% endemic), 1,159 species of lichen (11% endemic) and 6,900 species of fungi (27% endemic) (Singh et al., 1996). However, about 436 species have been reported threatened (Mehta et al., 2020). Similarly, the region is rich in faunal diversity and 65% mammals, 50% birds, 35% reptiles, 36% amphibians and 17% fishes of India are reported from IHR. All this reflects the high representativeness of IHR biodiversity. However, to harness the value of IHR biodiversity, there is a need to understand it more holistically in the context of the global commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The convention broadly calls upon the parties for conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity (Han et al., 2014).
While actions for conservation of Biological Diversity are more oriented towards addressing associated weaknesses and threats, the sustainable use perspective mostly targets strengths and opportunities. Therefore, to ensure conservation and sustainable use, SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat) assessment has been conducted across 4 major attributes of IHR biodiversity, which include (i) richness and representativeness, (ii) uniqueness, (iii) strong IKP, and (iv) strong conservation area coverage. The outcome of SWOT is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 Himalayan Biodiversity – SWOT analysis
Strengths | Weaknesses | Opportunity | Threats |
Richness & Representativeness | |||
Forested Landscape (one third of India) | High dependence | Carbon sink | Increasing pressure – infrastructure |
Alpine Ecosystem (100% of India) | Poor management | Harnessing diversity – e.g., tourism | Habitat loss |
Biodiversity (high proportion of India) | Missing holistic understanding | Harvesting values – medicinal, wild edible plants | Over & unscientific harvesting |
Sustaining flow of ESs | Increasing people’s apathy | ||
Uniqueness – ‘incomparable value’ | |||
Endemic species | Fragility of ecosystem | Maintaining unique genes for posterity | Climate change impacts |
Specific habitats (e.g., wetlands, timberline) | Inadequate knowledge base | Harnessing potential – e.g. nature tourism | Increasing invasion |
Special ecosystems (e.g., alpine meadows; cold deserts, agro-ecosystems) | No specific management focus and poor appreciation of values | Effective use for economic upliftment | Human induced perturbations |
Strong Indigenous Knowledge & Practices (IKP) | |||
Food, Fibre, Medicine, Fodder, Fuel | Economic marginality-poverty | Building on IKP | Erosion of IKP |
Agro-diversity & Farming Practices | Heavy dependence on bioresources | Value addition for income generation | People’s disinterest on agriculture & resource management |
Community management – Van Panchayat, Sacred sites | Overlaps in institutional interests | Expansion of food base-climate resilient crops | Non use focus of Conservation |
Misfit policies & programmes | Participatory management | ||
Strong Conservation Area Coverage | |||
PA coverage (more than national average) | PAs as no go area | Promotion of community based conservation | Strong conflicts with people |
Biosphere Reserves (40% of country) | Lack of research integration in PA Management | Scientific management | Shifting species/community boundaries under CC |
Community Conservation Areas | Inadequate infrastructure | Provisioning of PES | Departmental Resistance |
Poor awareness on BRs and CCAs | Securing livelihoods |
Following the SWOT assessment, IHR biodiversity, despite being rich and representative suffers from issues of high dependence of people, poor management, and lack of holistic understanding. All this has led to severe degradation and endangerment of biodiversity. Further, increasing pressure of development infrastructure, concurrent habitat loss, over and unscientific harvesting accompanied by increasing people’s apathy, have increased the threats on IHR biodiversity. The region being young is geologically in dynamic state that makes the system fragile from geo-morphological point of view. Further, under increasing threat of global warming the Himalayan region is reported to be vulnerable on two main counts: (i) warming trends are higher in the region, and (ii) the impacts are magnified by the sharp change in altitude over small distances. Indian National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) also underlines the intense vulnerability of this region towards climate change. The change in climate is predicted to impact the global mountains including Himalaya and thus the biodiversity and human wellbeing. In addition to climate change, anthropogenic disturbances like massive deforestation and rapid land use changes are also leading to habitat loss of threatened/ endemic species in the Himalaya (Reddy et al., 2013).
Over the years, the urbanization has increased from 25.7% in 1991 to 31.14% in 2011. It is well known that any erosion in the biodiversity would influence forestry, agriculture, livestock husbandry, Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) based livelihoods and many other intangible services of the ecosystems connected with the lowlands of India. Shifting cultivation in northern India, has posed serious environmental threats such as deforestation, biodiversity loss, soil and nutrient erosions and a loss of a variety of food crops (Umakant et al., 2017). Among various alien invasive species, Lantana camara, Eupatorium spp., Parthenium hysterophorus and Ageratum spp. have spread over large areas of IHR, severely impacting the plant diversity of the region (Pathak et al., 2019). The growing list of threatened species reflects the increasing magnitude of the problem. A recent report on threatened species of Indian Himalaya indicates the presence of 456 taxa under various threat categories of IUCN (Mehta et al., 2020). The vulnrrability of the Himalayan region to various threates call for increased attention to the conservation of biodiversity and sustaining the liveliood in changing outlook.
The innumerable ecosystem services provided by the IHR are not only significant to the local inhabitants but also vital for downstream and adjoining neighbouring countries. Considering the importance of IHR, National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) has recognized IHR vital for ecological security of the country. This unparalleled plant diversity of the IHR, besides fulfilling the provisioning requirements and utilities of local populace, is widely used in traditional/modern health care systems, and carries a great existence and option value. Considering the value of biodiversity and its benefit to human well-being, effective and urgent global action was initiated to halt biodiversity loss through the Convention on Biological Diversity and its “Aichi Biodiversity Targets” (Han et al., 2014). The mission of CBD is to halt the loss of biodiversity in order to ensure that by 2020 ecosystems become resilient and continue to provide essential services, thereby securing the planet’s variety of life, and contributing to human well-being, and poverty eradication. The growing concern is therefore to save biodiversity for sustaining the future.
The Himalaya is important from the standpoint of a biodiversity hotspot that maintains the flow of ecosystem services and basic raw materials for the subsistence livelihoods of the inhabitants. However, these resources are overexploited for various use, which make them more vulnerable under changing climate. Further, the region is fragile and also the resources in the region are vulnerable to environmental perturbations, and anthropogenic disturbances. High dependency on these resources, resulted degradation and deteriorating conditions of the forests and alpine ecosystems.
In spite of the crucial ecological, cultural and economic importance of the Himalayan ecosystem, the ecosystems are deteriorating due to increasing anthropogenic pressure. The situtaion of resource degradation is speedily changing with globalization and global warming. Among others, warming contributes changes in phenology of climate sensitive species (Filter and Filter 2002), and will continue to be affected with projected climate change in the Himalayan region (IPCC 2007). Climate change has already impacted forests, agriculture and the food system in the region. For example, decline in production of apple and other agri-horticultural crops due to low snowfall in the Himachal Pradesh is well cited. Also, shift in species/community boundaries in the region under climate change scenarioare reported (Telwala et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2016). Further, fast erosion of indegenous knowledge practices (IKP)is alarming as this knowledge had remained foundation of sustainable resource mangement by the indigenious communities in the region. While the Himalayan region is considered strong w.r.t. the existing conservation area network, putting Protected Areas (PAs) as ‘No go area’ for people, poor integration of researches in PA management, inadequate infrastructure, and poor awareness on Biosphere Reserves (BRs) and Community Conserved Areas (CCAs) makes this conservation network weak in the context of current global thinking on conservation.
The wealth of biodiversity of this region supports peoples’ livelihoods directly and indirectly through a range of ecosystem goods and services. For instance, for centuries the subsistence living of local communities has depended on traditional agriculture and livestock farming, which largely revolves around biomass harvesting from the forests. According to an estimate, to generate one unit of energy from agriculture, 10–12 energy units of forest biomass are required (Negi et al., 2012). More than 41.5% of geographical area of IHR is under forest cover representing one-third of forest cover of India, and of which nearly half (47%) is of the “very good” forest cover category of the country. Forests are obviously one of the most important resources in the IHR states, and have direct role in supporting rural livelihoods not only by meeting the people’s day to day needs of fuel wood, fodder and timber but also by providing employment in some areas. The potential or the opportunities with IHR has been described in the following sections:
The Himalayan forests form a very large reservoir of carbon pool. As per, India’s State of Forest Report-2019 (FSI 2019), the forests in Indian Himalayan region (excluding hill district of Assam and West Bengal) has 2849.2 million tonnes of total stock of carbon (both biomass and soil), which represents nearly 40% of total carbon pool of India’s forests. The forest carbon stock in IHR states has increased by 20.6% from 2017 estimates. In this period, national increase of carbon stock was about 1% only. More importantly, the carbon stock in forest biomass (above and below ground) has increased from 802.8 million tonnes (2019) thereby registering an increase of 57% carbon in biomass pool. This suggests Himalayan forests are great accumulator of carbon. A recent study by Tolangay and Moktan (2020) indicates that the IHR sequesters about 65 million tonnes of carbon each year, and conclude ‘the Himalayan forests have the potential to mitigate climate change and global warming’. Carbon sequestration is among the most important ecosystem services provided by forested regions that play an important role in global climate mitigation. Therefore, as part of action during UN decade of ecosystem restoration (2021–29), the restoration of degraded land through plantation of multifarious species integrating traditional and scientific knowledge with local participation in the Himalayan region would not only ensure biodiversity conservation, flow of forest goods to the local inhabitants, but also contribute for climate change mitigation. Sustainable forestry practices can increase the ability of forests to sequester atmospheric CO while at the same time enhance other ecosystem goods and services. This can be made possible with optimal participation of local people in restoration and management practices.
The community forests (i.e. Van Panchayats) of Uttarakhand are known to play a vital role in forest protection and resource management. Across the world, Community Forests (CFs) are considered as an important means of forest management, biodiversity conservation, poverty reduction and ecological sustainability. However, due to increased vulnerability these VPs in the Himalaya needs urgent attention for continuous flow of goods and services (Thakur et al., 2020). The scenario can be changed with appropriate interventions to make these VPFs more relevant for local people as well as towards the emerging global targets of conservation and sustainable development. This calls for adequate policy and practice encouragement, and resource sharing from the government. Also, engagement of relevant R&D institutions to bring-in knowledge and technical inputs would accelerate the process of ecological restoration of community forests.
One of the India’s important global commitment is the Bonn challenge, which was joined by India in 2015 and pledged to bring under restoration 13 million hectares of degraded land by 2020, and an additional 8 million hectares by 2030. These targets, although ambitions, are achievable if the drivers of forest landscape degradation are identified and appropriate intervention set in motion (Bhattacharya et al., 2018). Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR), the ongoing process of regaining ecological functionality and enhancing human well-being across deforested landscape, is one of the most practical ways of achieving these national targets and international commitments. The Himalaya being a forested landscape inherently becomes the major candidate for FLR programmes. Particularly such programmes need greater attention during decade of ecosystem restoration. Ecological restoration tries to restore the original biodiversity and ecosystem processes that existed before the degradation (Díaz et al., 2015). This is relatively a difficult task. However, regaining ecological functionality as enshrined in the concept of FLR is more feasible.
Many restoration projects have been implemented and many are under consideration, but only few have made significant impacts. Few success stories of GBP-NIHE are available in different part of IHR, which succeeded in converting converted conceptual idea into a practical implementation (Maikhuri et al., 1997, 2000a; Negi et al., 2015). Such pilots need to be up-scaled in the region. Also, other agencies, including forest departments have made significant contribution w.r.t. forest conservation. However, considering the interests of local inhabitants, participatory action research framework and approaches for restoration of degraded forest land, are likely to deliver better results (Negi et al., 2015; Bhatt et al., 2020). Active participation of local stakeholders is a prerequisite to success of any land restoration effort in the region. This can be done very effectively with empowering the community through their skill and capacity building on plantation techniques, identification of most suitable species, and sharing of knowledge (Maikhuri et al., 1997). In order to harness the opportunity offered by the Himalayan Biodiversity to implement the restoration and rehabilitation programme, following need to be considered:(i) selection of plant species by the local stakeholders and scientist, (ii) ensure soil and water management, (iii) ensure long term benefits in terms of fuel, fodder, timber and ecological safeguards to the community, and (iv) involve local people in all stages of implementation.
Indian classical (i.e. Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, and Swa-rigpa) and the folk health care systems are largely dependent upon the wide diversity of plants which is estimated about 6,500 species. The Indian Himalaya harbours over one-fourth of these plants. A large number of these medicinal plants are considered globally significant (Table 2).
Table 2 List of Globally significant medicinal plants found in the IHR
Species | Family | Parts Used | Medicinal Value/Use |
Aconitum heterophyllum | Ranunculaceae | Roots | Fever, diarrhea |
Aconitum violaceum | Ranunculaceae | Roots | antidote |
Aconitum balfouri | Ranunculaceae | Roots | Arthritis, leprosy & paralysis |
Aegle marmelos | Rutaceae | Fruit | Stomach ulcer & heartburn |
Allium stracheyi | Liliaceae | Whole plant | Jaundice, cold, cough |
Angelica glauca | Apiaceae | Root | Dysentery, Constipation |
Arnebia benthamii | Boraginaceae | Root | Respiratory troubles, wound healing |
Berberis aristata | Berberidaceae | Root, Bark | Anti-bacterial, cough, anti-diabetics |
Bergenia cilaiata | Saxifragaceae | Rhizome | Fever, cough, cold, and Kidney stone |
Bergenia stracheyi | Saxifragaceae | Rhizome | Kidney stone & gastro intestinal disorder |
Dactylorhiza hatagirea | Orchidaceae | Tubers | cough and cold, stomachache, cuts & wounds healing |
Dioscorea deltoidea | Dioscoreaceae | Tuber | Vermifuge, asthama, arthritis |
Emblica officinalis | Euphorbiaceae | Fruit | Diarrhea |
Fritillaria roylei | Liliaceac | Bulb | Jaundice & inflammation cough |
Malaxis muscifera | Orchidaceae | Pseudo-bulb | Fever, dysentery |
Nardostachys grandiflora | Valerianaceae | Rhizome/root | Heart pain, urination, digestion |
Paeonia emodi | Paeoniaceae | Roots, stem & leaf | Fever, diabetes & stomach pain |
Paris polyphylla | Liliaceae | Roots | Burns, cut, diarrhea, dysentery |
Picrorhiza kurrooa | Scrophulariaceae | Root/stem | Fever, diabetes, stomach disorder, jaundice |
Podophyllum hexandrum | Berberidaceae | Fruits | Cough, cancer |
Rheum emodi | Polygonaceae | Rhizome | Fever, cough, indigestion |
Rheum moorcroftianum | Polygonaceae | Rhizome | Hyperlipidemia, anti-cancer, |
Swertia chirayita | Gentianaceae | Whole plant | Fever, ulcers, diabetes |
Taxus baccata | Taxaceae | Leaves, Bark | Anticancer, cold, cough, fever |
Terminalia chebula | Combretaceae | Fruit | Cough, dysentery |
Tinospora cordifolia | Menispermaceae | Stem | Diabetes, fever |
Valeriana jatamansi | Valerianaceae | Tuber | Stomach disorder, epilepsy, skin diseases |
Medicinal Plants (MPs) sector across the globe has received high momentum in view of its potential for the source of raw material of modern therapeutics and precursor molecules for synthesis and preparation of new drugs (Shahidullah and Emdad 2010). MPs in the IHR are also reported to significantly contribute to affordable healthcare in the rural and remote areas (Goraya and Ved 2017; Negi et al., 2018). The global market for plant-derived drugs was valued $1.2 billion in 1990s, and has increased to $25.6 billion in 2015 (Roosta et al., 2017). This is expected to reach $35.4 billion in 2020 with a compound annual growth rate of 6.6% from 2015 to 2020. Even today with so much of progress in drug industries, the fact remains that 70–95% population in developing countries still depends on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (MAPs) for their primary healthcare. In the Himalaya, traditional herbal medicines are rooted in indigenous knowledge systems, and play a crucial role in decision making with respect to the use of medicinal plants resources (Kala 2005; Negi et al., 2018).
Medicinal plants form an important component of livelihood and critical source of income in the IHR states. This is particularly true in areas such as high alpine regions, where agricultural outputs are low and opportunities for income generation largely depend on natural resources. Till date most of the herbal raw material is coming from the wild. However, with changing laws and protection regimes accompanied by increasing global demand there is a need to bring these plants under cultivation. The gap between the demand and supply is widening, which has affected pharmaceuticals companies on one hand and livelihoods of local people on the other. While efforts are on, there are big gap areas. This creates great opportunity for both science and technological interventions. For instance, propagation packages developed by various R&D organizations for high value medicinal plants now need to be transferred to farmer’s field for development of cultivation packages. The research being conducted on chemical and genetic constituents of Himalayan medicinal plants can prove greatly beneficial. For example a study by Rawat et al. (2016) on anti oxidant anti-microbial properties of some ethno-therapeutically important medicinal plants of IHR suggest that extract of these species can be used as natural anti-oxidant to reduce free radical mediated disorders and as alternative for food preserves. Further, in-situ and ex-situ conservation of MPs need to be promoted through local participation and quality seed production through scientific organizations. For instance, recognizing the conservation value of threatened species, the GBP-NIHE is effectively using the biotechnological approaches especially in case of species which are difficult to propagate through conventional methods and having scarce availability in the wild. Around 82 species have been successfully used for developing in vitro propagation protocols and the list is continuously growing (Palni et al., 2018).
Some of the medicinal herbs are unique to Himalaya region, especially those growing in alpine areas and endemic. Among others, recently one particular species, Ophiocordyceps sinensis (Caterpillar fungus, locally Keera jari), from higher altitudes of Himalaya has attracted special attention with the market demand increasing multiple folds. In last three decades collection of high-value, low-volume Caterpillar fungus has become an important livelihood activities and source of income in the IHR. In India, it has emerged as an important contributor to economy of many high altitude villages (earning between Rs. 1-3 lakhs per annum), those engaged in pastoral activities especially in Uttarakhand (Negi et al., 2014, 2020). The species is used for the treatment of many ailments like diarrhea, headache, cough, rheumatism, asthma, pulmonary diseases, cardiovascular disorder, sexual dysfunction, renal and liver disease for centuries (Winkler, 2009). The product named as Himalayan Herbal Viagra with its widely popularized aphrodisiac properties has resulted in multifold increase in its price within a small period of time. However, on account of its ever increasing demand and rapid decline in natural populations, the species has been listed in the endangered category (IUCN 2020). Reports indicate, the availability of the resource has declined, and harvesting has become difficult in recent years. This calls for attention with respect to sustainability of its habitats in particular and alpine meadows in general. Further, the emergence of caterpillar fungus as game changer, both in socio-economic and ecological domain, brings issues pertaining to governance of this common’s resource on fore front.
In view of declining production due to overharvesting as well as changing climate, and likely implications of this decline for dependent community, there is an urgent need to find alternative livelihood options for communities associated with. There exists a great opportunity to explore possibility of the value addition in caterpillar fungus in the form of supplementary food as well as medicinal products for creating the livelihood opportunity to the local community in the IHR states particularly Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, and Uttarakhand. Amid COVID-19 pandemic situation the attention on herbal products as immunity booster has grown considerably. The Ayurvedic products have gained huge ground and thus creating enormous opportunity for economic gains through nutraceutical and pharmaceutical sectors.
In recent decades, particular attention has been paid to mainstreaming local biodiversity for food and nutrition security by several UNGA Resolutions including World Health Assembly (WHO 2013; United Nations 2020). Forest products constitute an important source of livelihood for millions of people across the world (Mamo et al., 2007). Among these products, wild edible plants form a large part. Of the various components of biodiversity, the conservation and sustainable use of wild edibles is receiving increased attention due to their crucial roles in global healthcare system, particularly in the developing world (Chen et al., 2016).Wild edibles are used as source of food in many developing countries and thus provide an adequate level of nutrition to the human beings (Maikhuri et al., 2004; Murphy et al., 2005).
In the Himalaya, wild fruits contribute to diet diversity and flavour thereby forming an essential part of nutritionally diet of rural poor, and provide essential micronutrients (Bhatt et al., 2017). Wild edibles enrich dietary quality of food and frequently eaten as supplement of proteins, essential minerals, micronutrients, and vitamins and thus provide an affordable source of nutrition for rural and indigenous in the IHR (Table 3). A total of 675 species of wild edibles in 149 families and 384 genera have been reported in the Himalaya (Samant et al., 1998).The rich diversity of wild edibles in Indian Himalaya not only provides nutritious food, but also income to tribal and poor people living close to forests and rural areas. For example consumption of branded cold drinks in urban and semi-urban areas in Uttarakhand is being gradually replaced by juice/squash/pickle prepared from wild edible fruits/flowers i.e., Myrica esculenta, Rhododendron arboreum, Hippophae salicifolia, Aegle marmelos, Emblica officinalis (Negi et al. 2011; Figure 1).
Table 3 List of potential wild edible species having potential for value addition and small scale entrepreneurship in Uttarakhand
Medicinal Use in | |||
Harvesting | Traditional | ||
Plant Species | Period | Traditional Uses | Healthcare System |
Aegle marmelos | Jun–Jul | Fruits used for preparation of juice and squash | Unripe fruit is consumed raw to treat diarrhea. Juice prepared from ripe fruit is used to cure constipation |
Berberis aristata | May–Jun | Fruits used for preparation of juice and squash | Root decoction is taken orally in ulcer, stomachache, diabetes, skin disease and asthma |
Bauhinia variegata | Apr–May | Flowers used for preparation of pickle and as vegetable | Dried root and bark are taken orally to treat diarrhea |
Diplazium esculentum | May–Jul | Circinately coiled juvenile leaves used for pickle and vegetable | It is used to cure jaundice and constipation |
Ficus auriculata | Jun–Jul | Fruits used for preparation of pickle and vegetable | Leaves decoction is taken orally to cure jaundice and hepatitis |
Hippophae salicifolia | Oct–Nov | Fruits used for preparation of juice, squash and chutney | The decoction of the fruit juice is taken to treat liver disorder, jaundice and cough |
Myrica esculenta | Apr–Jun | Fruits used for preparation of jam, squash and juice | The fresh fruit and its juice are consumed in indigestion and headache |
Prinsepia utilis | May–Jul | Fruits oil used for cooking | Seed oil is used to treat high blood pressure and high level of cholesterol |
Pyracantha crenulata | Set–Oct | Fruits used for preparation of jam, squash and juice | Powder of dried fruit is used to cure bloody dysentery |
Phyllanthus emblica | Mar–May | Fruits used for preparation of pickle, squash and juice | Fruits are used to treat diabetes, anaemia and jaundice |
Rhododendron arboreum | Mar–Apr | Flowers used for preparation of squash, juice and sauce | Flowers juice is used to treat diabetes, respiratory and digestive problems |
Rubus ellipticus | Apr–May | Fruits used for preparation of jam and jelly | The juice of the root is used in the treatment of fevers, gastric troubles and dysentery |
Spondias pinnata | Jan–Mar | Fruits used for preparation of juice, squash, candy and sauce | Ripened fruits and its juice used to cure dysentery, diabetes, and gastric problems |
Viburnum mullaha | Sep–Oct | Fruits used for preparation of juice and sauce | Juice of the fruit is used to treat indigestion |
A study in Almora district, Indian west Himalaya, reveals that the sale of Myrica esculenta fruits brings each household Rs. 913–3713 (US$ 26–106) per season, which was significant considering low annual per-capita income in the region (Bhatt et al., 2000). Likewise the study by Rawat et al. (2014) on nutritional and antioxidant potential of selected vitality strengthening Himalayan plants has highlighted the possibilities of harnessing potential of such plants. An assessment of antioxidant properties in fruits of Myrica esculenta reveals that the consumption of this wild edible fruit helps in reducing free radicals. At present there is an increasing demand of wild edibles for diverse health related solutions and livelihood need. However, the use of wild edibles is limited to certain traditional communities/areas, inspite of their huge commercial potential. This offers great possibilities in the development of wild edible based local and regional entrepreneurship, and source of alternate food and nutrition to global society.
IHR is well recognized for prevalence of Indigenous Knowledge and Practices (IKP) which have helped the communities in meeting their needs related to food and nutrition as well as health care. Besides strengthening medicinal plant and wild edible sectors, the IKP has helped in sustaining the traditional agriculture system in the region, which is seen in the form of enormous enrichment of genetic diversity in the land races. Agro-diversity is the major life support system of the people living in the Himalayan region. In the Himalaya, subsistence agriculture remains the core of household economy (Maikhuri et al., 2001). Food consumption is, therefore, both driving force as well as outcome of mountain livelihood systems and social organization. Rural communities in the region have developed several indigenous and traditional methods of farming to manage and conserve the traditional varieties/landraces of crops, and celebrate agro-diversity with religious and cultural passion in the region (Negi and Maikhuri 2013). The farmers ensure adequate supply of organic inputs to their fields from the surrounding forests. This system of nature based farming has evolved and flourished over millennia following trial and error approach. The genetic heterogeneity of agricultural crops in the region not only enables farmers to face challenges of crisis, such as under changing climate, but also ensures food and nutritional security to most vulnerable groups (Maikhuri et al., 2001; Farooquee and Maikhuri 2009).
Traditional crops provide ranges of options to address the complex interface between food insecurity, and natural resource degradation, allowing coping mechanism specific to the adverse climatic conditions (Maikhuri et al., 2001; Farooquee and Maikhuri 2009). Many location specific traditional crop produces are increasingly being appreciated across the world as the possible solution to food and nutritional security (Hajjar et al., 2008). Various varieties as well as the traditional cuisines made out of these have been found nutritionally rich and full of antioxidant potential. Therefore, promotion of such underutilized crops in farming system is very much needed. For example, government of Uttarakhand is promoting traditional crops, and the recipes prepared of these crops through home-stay accommodations. The traditional farming system in the region, especially in rainfed conditions, represents a true model of organic farming and produce, having high demand in the regional market. Motivation is urgently required to the farming communities by supporting premier and minimum support price to tradition food commodities.
Improvement of crop yield through enhancement of biodiversity i.e., pollinators may be a sustainable pathway towards greater food supply (Garibaldi et al., 2016). For example Gaira et al. (2016) reported increasing abundance of bumble-bee (Bombus sp.) resulted in significantly (p 0.03) higher yield of the crop (average 17–41 g/plant). The study further reported increasing abundance of all bees lead to significant (p 0.01) increase in crop yield (average 21–41 g/plant). Moreover, from a food-security point of view, pollinator dependent crops provide essential micronutrients to human health where needed (Chaplin-Kramer et al., 2014). Such sustainable increases may be especially important for the 2 billon global people reliant on small farms, many of which are undernourished. Therefore, great scope exists for extensive research and knowledge generation in this aspect considering that market based sourcing of food fails in meeting the quality and diversity needs that produced in homesteads. Also, realizing that the dependence on markets alone leads to crisis during pandemic situations like COVID-19, this is high time to frame strategies to harness potential of agro-ecological farming practices in the Himalaya by promoting principle of ‘Collectively’. The traditional farming systems and practices also provide great scope for promoting agro-diversity based rural tourism.
IHR has a strong coverage of Protected Areas, which is more than national average. Strong networks of Biosphere reserves and community conserved areas further contribute for the in situ conservation of biodiversity. These conservation areas, being pristine in nature, provide scope for evolutionary processes of biodiversity. However, in the context of human well-being these conservation sites are gaining importance as nature based tourism promotion sites. While discussing institutional arrangements for managing tourism in Protected Areas of Himalaya, Badola et al. (2017) indicated that the tourism has the potential to advance biodiversity conservation through the creation of societal constituency by providing alternative livelihood to resource dependent communities. The community forest (i.e. Van Panchayats) in Uttarakhand have already proved a highly potential sites for sustainable eco-tourism development through integration with women run home stays in Munsiyari, Pithoragarh (Badola et al. 2017). Earlier, Maikhuri et al. (2000b) had suggested potential of ecotourism in buffer zone areas of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve as an option for resolving people-policy conflict in the region. Among others, the sacred groves or sacred natural sites in the IHR are also gaining tourism popularity due to their pristinely as well as linkages with cultural heritage. Mawphlang sacred forest of Meghalaya is one such example which has emerged as an ideal site for nature lovers (incredibleindia.org).
Among other features of Himalayan biodiversity, the endemism (i.e. uniqueness) of species deserves special attention. While in general 30–40% plant species are considered endemic, the percentage goes high in higher altitudes towards alpine regions (Dhar 2002). As the alpine ecosystems, in the context of Indian landmass, are confined in the Himalaya therefore, the biodiversity of these ecosystems become unique to entire country. Especially the endemics having other than conservation value, such as medicinal, edible, etc., provide greater opportunity for human well fare, provided the potential is harnessed in systematic and scientific way. Besides wild, the diversity of genes prevalent in domesticated biodiversity is another major potential in the region. The Himalaya represents 3 sub-centres of plant origin and distribution out of 8 in the country. This along with the eco-climatic diversity of the Himalaya accompanied by diversity of socio-cultural system has resulted in diversity of agricultural crops and practices. The diversity of landraces across the region makes the agro-diversity rich and unique, which provides various opportunities for harnessing benefits. The value of agrodiversity in nutritional security of Himalayan region is well documented (Bungla et al., 2019). However, in recent times when COVID-19 pandemic has impacted entire humanity, the immunity boosting features of traditional crop varieties in the Himalaya are being highlighted. Adaptability of several traditional crops has protected the hill farmers from absolute crop failure since millennia. All this gives us opportunity to build on this potential.
Undoubtedly, the Himalayan Biodiversity provides a resource base and ecosystem services that sustain life of millions of people in uplands and billions in down streams. Yet, the appreciation for this valuable resource has remained at the low ebb. Especially the people in low lands, inhabiting areas much beyond physical boundary of the Himalaya, pay very little attention to these valuable services provided by Himalayan biodiversity. As a result they are unable to appreciate these values. Therefore, while thinking about harnessing the potential of Himalayan biodiversity there is a need to promote awareness among masses, both in upland and lowlands, about values of biodiversity. In this context, conservation education can be seen as a potential tool for empowerment leading to action, involving actual participation of students, teachers and scientists (Maikhuri et al., 2009). Students and teachers being the most influential components of society need to be engaged in the biodiversity related initiatives.
GBP-NIHE has played an important role in developing curiosity and encourage students in the field of biodiversity conservation and management (Dhar et al., 1999; 2002). Students and teachers of different schools, and also the villagers in different locations were the major target group of such capacity building training programmes. The students and teachers were encouraged to make detailed observations and engage themselves with vegetation sampling, herbarium preparation and general awareness on the types of forests and plants. The noteworthy feature of this programme was open and face-to-face discussions of students from remote and rural areas with eminent scientists and researchers, without any hesitation. These programmes have yielded good results. The students and teachers exposed to these programmes had subsequently shown greater appreciation for biodiversity. These programmes were found effective and have gained momentum towards understanding the biodiversity from micro to macro level. Such mechanism is required to be up-scaled across IHR states and in areas where ecosystem services from Himalaya are realized. Further, Government of India has lauched Green Skill Development Programme to sensitize the local people in natural resource based livelihood options and biodiversity conservation in general. The programme endeavors to develop green skilled workforce having technical knowledge of sustainably using the nature and its components, and commitment for sustainable development. Increasing number of such stakholders will go a long way in providing income opportunity in the region. There is a great need to systematically and frequently organize such biodiversity based green skilling pragrammes across the IHR. These programmes are expected to yield benefits of biodiversity conservation and sustainable use in the region.
The Indian Himalaya, as provider of global goods and range of ecosystem services is vital for sustaining life of billions of people both in uplands and downstream. The potential of bio-resources such as medicinal plants, wild edibles, traditional crops, etc., is getting attention for optimal and sustainable use to enhance the livelihood options for local inhabitants. However, while developing a strategy for harnessing potential of Himalayan biodiversity, there is a need to critically evaluate Strength, Weakness, opportunities and Threats (SWOT). The 2021-2030 being decade of ecosystem restoration, there exists an opportunity to enhance the scope of biodiversity through wide range restoration activities. The benefits of the same will be multipronged and long-lasting, both for realizing conservation and sustainable use efforts of Himalayan biodiversity. More importantly the Himalayan biodiversity values require due appreciation from the beneficiaries. In this context, promotion of conservation education emerges as a practical tool.
Badola, E., Rawal, R.S. & Dhyani, P.P. (2017). Stories of success-narratives from a sacred land. GBPIHED, Almora, Uttarakhand (India).
Bhatt, I.D., Negi, V.S., & Rawal, R.S. (2020). Promoting Nature-Based Solution (NbS) through restoration of degraded landscapes in the Indian Himalayan Region. In Nature-based Solutions for Resilient Ecosystems and Societies (pp. 197–211). Springer, Singapore.
Bhatt, I.D., Rawal, R.S. & Dhar, U. (2000). The availability, fruit yield and harvest of Myrica esculenta Buch-Ham ex D.Don in Kumaun (West Himalaya), India. Mountain Research and Development 20(2), 146–153.
Bhatt, I.D., Rawat, S., Badhani, A. & Rawal, R.S. (2017). Nutraceutical potential of selected wild edible fruits of the Indian Himalayan region. Food chemistry 215, 84–91.
Bhattacharya, A., Rawal, R.S., Negi G.C.S., Joshi, R., Sharma, S., Rawat, D.S., Ishwar, N.H., Rawat, J.S., Sinha, P.R., Jia, L., & Marten, J. (2018). Assessing Landscape Restoration Opputunities for Uttarakhand, India, New Delhi, IUCN-India.
Chaplin-Kramer R., Dombeck E., Gerber J., Knuth K.A., Mueller N.D., Mueller M., Ziv G., & Klein A.M. (2014). Global malnutrition overlaps with pollinator-dependent micronutrient production. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1794):20141799.
Chen, S.L., Yu, H., Luo, H.M., Wu, Q., Li, Q.F., & Steinmetz, A. (2016). Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: problems, progress, and prospects. Chinese Medicine 11:37.
Chettri, N. & Sharma, E. (2016). Reconciling the mountain biodiversity conservation and human wellbeing: drivers of biodiversity loss and new approaches in the Hindu-Kush Himalayas. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy 82, 53–73.
Desai, B.H., Oli, K.P., Yang, Yongping, Chettri, N., & Sharma, E. (2011). Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity: A retrospective analysis in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan countries. Kathmandu: ICIMOD.
Dhar U., Rawal R.S., Airi S., Bhatt I.D., & Samant S.S. (2002). Promoting outreach through conservation education programmes – Case study from Indian Himalayan Region. Current Science 82(7), 808–815.
Dhar U., Rawal R.S., Samant S.S., Airi S., & Upreti J. (1999). People’s participation in Himalayan biodiversity conservation: A practical approach. Current Science 76(1), 36–40.
Dhar, U. (2002). Conservation implications of plant endemism in high-altitude Himalaya. Current Science 82(2), 141–148.
Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Joly, C., Lonsdale, W.M. & Larigauderie, A. (2015). A Rosetta Stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology, 13(1), p. e1002040.
Farooquee, A.N., & Maikhuri, R.K. (2009). Communities and their agrobiodiversity priorities for agriculture in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Outlook on Agriculture 38(4), 383–389.
Fitter, A.H., & Fitter, R.S.R. (2002). Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296, 1689–1691.
Forest Survey of India 2019 – State of Forest Report. FSI Dehradun.
Gaira K.S., Rawal R.S., & Singh K.K. (2016). Variations in pollinator density and impacts on large cardamom (Amomum subulatum Roxb.) crop yield in Sikkim Himalaya. India J Asia-Pacifc Biodiv 9, 17–21.
Garibaldi L.A., Carvalheiro L.G., Vaissière B.E., Gemmill-Herren B., Hipólito J., Freitas B.M., Ngo H.T., Azzu N., Sáez A., Åström J. & An J. (2016). Mutually beneficial pollinator diversity and crop yield outcomes in small and large farms. Science 351(6271), 388–391.
Goraya, G.S,. & Ved, D.K. (2017). Medicinal Plants in India: An Assessment of their Demand and Supply. National Medicinal Plants Board, Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, New Delhi and Indian Council of Forestry Research & Education, Dehradun.
Hajjar, R., Jarvis, D.I. & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2008). The utility of crop genetic diversity in maintaining ecosystem services. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 123, 261–270.
Han, X., Smyth, R.L., Young, B.E., Brooks, T.M., & Sánchez de Lozada, A. (2014). A Biodiversity Indicators Dashboard: Addressing Challenges to Monitoring.
IPCC (2007). Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. See http://www.ipcc.ch
IUCN (2020). Internation Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN.Org).
Kala C.P. (2005). Indigenous uses, population density and conservation of threatened medicinal plants in protected areas of the Indian Himalayas. Conservation Biology 19, 368–378.
Maikhuri R.K., Rao, K.S., & Semwal R.L. (2001). Changing scenario of Himalayan agroecosytem: Loss of agrobiodiversity, an indicatorof environmental change in central Himalaya, India. The Environmentalist 20, 23–39.
Maikhuri R.K., Semwal R.L., Rao K.S., Singh K., & Saxena K.G. (2000a). Growth and ecological impacts of traditional agroforestry tree species in Central Himalaya, India. Agrofor. Syst. 48, 257–272.
Maikhuri R.K., Senwal R.L., Rao K.S., & Saxena K.G. (1997) Rehabilitation of degraded community lands for sustainable development in Himalaya: a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 4(3), 192–203.
Maikhuri, R.K., Rana, U., Rao, K.S., Nautiyal, S., & Saxena, K.G. (2000b). Promoting ecotourism in the buffer zone areas of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve: An option to resolve people—policy conflict. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 7(4), 333–342.
Maikhuri, R.K., Rao, K.S., & Saxena, K.G. (2004). Bioprospecting of wild edibles for rural development in the central Himalayan mountain of India. Mountain Research and Development 24, 110–113.
Maikhuri, R.K., Rawat, L.S., Farooquee, N.A., & Rao, K.S. (2009). Science motivational training programme. Current Science 1040–1043.
Mamo G., Sjaastad E., & Vedeld P. (2007). Economic dependence on forest resources: a case from DendiDistrict, Ethiopia. Forest Policy Economics 9(8), 916–927.
Mehta, P., Sekar, K.C., Bhatt, D., Tewari, A., Bisht, K., Upadhyay, S., Negi, V.S., & Soragi, B. (2020). Conservation and prioritization of threatened plants in Indian Himalayan Region. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:1–23.
Murphy I.K., Bhat P.R., Ravindranah N.H., & Sukumar R. (2005). Financial valuation of non-timber forest productflows in Uttara Kannada District, Western Ghats, Karnataka. Current Science 10(25), 1573–1579.
Negi V.S., & Maikhuri R.K. (2013). Socio-ecological and religious perspective of agrobiodiversity conservation: issues, concern and priority for sustainable agriculture, Central Himalaya. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics 26(2), 491–512.
Negi V.S., Bhatt I.D., Phondani P.C., & Kothyari B.P. (2015). Rehabilitation of degraded community land in Western Himalaya: linking environmental conservation with livelihood. Current Science 520–528.
Negi V.S., Maikhuri R.K., & Rawat L.S. (2012). Paradigm and ecological implication of changing agricultural land-use: A case study from Govind Wildlife Sanctuary, Central Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 9(4), 547–557.
Negi V.S., Rana S., Giri L., & Rawal R.S. (2020). Caterpillar Fungus in the Himalaya,Current Understanding and Future Possibilities. G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand, India. ISBN Number: 978-93-5416-900-7.
Negi, C.S., Pant M., Joshi P., & Bohra S. (2014). Yar tsa Gunbu [Ophiocordyceps sinensis (Berk.) G.H. Sung et al.]: the issue of its sustainability. Current Science 107, 882–887.
Negi, V.S, Maikhuri, R.K., & Rawat, L.S. 2011. Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs): A Viable Option for Biodiversity Conservation and Livelihood Enhancement in Central Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation 20:545–559.
Negi, V.S., Kewlani, P., Pathak, R., Bhatt, D., Bhatt, I.D., Rawal, R.S., Sundriyal, R.C. & Nandi, S.K., (2018). Criteria and indicators for promoting cultivation and conservation of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants in Western Himalaya, India. Ecological indicators 93, 434–446.
Palni, L.M.S., Lal A. & Pant, M. (2018). Ex situ approaches to conservation of Himalayan Biodiversity with particular reference to medicinalplants.In: Plant Diversity in the Himalaya Hotspot Region (Eds. Das AP and Bera S). Indian Books and periodicals.
Pathak, R., Negi, V.S., Rawal, R.S. & Bhatt, I.D. (2019). Alien plant invasion in the Indian Himalayan Region: state of knowledge and research priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation 28(12), 3073–3102.
Rawal RS, Bhatt ID, Sekar KC, & Nandi SK (2013) The Himalayan Biodiversity: Richness, Representativeness, Uniqueness and Life-support Values. G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development (GBPIHED), Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand, India, 84pp.
Rawat, S., Andola, H., Giri, L., Dhyani, P., Jugran, A., Bhatt, I.D. & Rawal, R.S. (2014). Assessment of nutritional and antioxidant potential of selected vitality strengthening Himalayan medicinal plants. International Journal of Food Properties 17(3), 703–712.
Rawat, S., Jugran, A.K., Bahukhandi, A., Bahuguna, A., Bhatt, I.D., Rawal, R.S. & Dhar, U., (2016). Anti-oxidant and anti-microbial properties of some ethno-therapeutically important medicinal plants of Indian Himalayan Region. Biotech 6(2), p. 154.
Reddy, C.S., Dutta, K., & Jha, C.S. (2013). Analysing the gross and net deforestation rates in India. Current Science 105, 1492–1500.
Roosta, R.A., Moghaddasi, R., & Hosseini, S.S. (2017). Export target markets of medicinal and aromatic plants. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2017.06.003.
Samant S.S., Dhar U. & Palni L.M.S. (1998). Medicinal plants of Indian Himalaya: diversity, distribution. Potential Value, Gyanodaya Prakashan.
Shahidullah A.K., & Haque C.E. (2010). Linking medicinal plant production with livelihood enhancement in Bangladesh: Implications of a vertically integrated value chain. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 9(2), 1.
Sharma, E. (2017). China–India collaborative opportunities on science and technology for sustainable development of the Hindu Kush Himalaya. Science Bulletin 3, 1–10.
Singh, R.D., Gumber, S., Tewari, P. & Singh, S.P. (2016). Nature of forest fires in Uttarakhand: frequency, size and seasonal patterns in relation to pre-monsoonal environment. Current Science 111(2): 398–403.
Spehn, E.M., Rudmann-Maurer, K., Körner, C. & Maselli, D. (2010). Mountain biodiversity and global change. Global Mountain Biodiversity Assessment.
Telwala Y., Brook B.W., Manish K. & Pandit M.K. (2013). Climate-induced elevational range shifts and increase in plant species richness in a Himalayan biodiversity epicentre. PloS one 8(2):e57103.
Thakur, S., Negi, V.S., Pathak, R., Dhyani, R., Durgapal, K., & Rawal, R.S. (2020). Indicator based integrated vulnerability assessment of community forests in Indian west Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management 457, 117674.
Tolangay, D. & Moktan, S. (2020). Trend of studies on carbon sequestration dynamics in the Himalaya hotspot region: A review. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 12, 647–660.
Umakanth, B., Vishalakshi, B., Sathish Kumar, P., Rama Devi, S.J.S., Bhadana, V.P., Senguttuvel, P., Kumar, S., Sharma, S.K., Sharma, P.K., Prasad, M.S. & Madhav, M.S. (2017). Diverse Rice landraces of North-East India enables the identification of novel genetic resources for magnaporthe resistance. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, p. 1500.
United Nations (2020). General Assembly (UNGA). Resolution A/RES/73/2. Political Declaration of the Third High-Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases.
WHO (2013). Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020.
Winkler, D. (2009). Caterpillar Fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) Production and Sustainability on the Tibetan Plateau and in the Himalayas. Asian Medicine 5, 291–316.
Late Ranbeer Rawal (26.4.1965–23.4.2021) obtained his Ph.D. in Botany from Kumaun University, Nainital, and has research experience of over 30 years. He has been associated with GBP-NIHE for the past 25 years as a scientist, and as Director from 2018–2021 (April 23). His specialization was in floristic ecology and conservation biology. He has published more than 200 peer reviewed papers. His work on ex-situ conservation models, participatory conservation education and transboundary landscape management has been recognized globally. Dr. Rawal has coordinated and supervised various national, international and trans-boundary projects. He has contributed to Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) as a lead author, and was elected ‘Sectional President’ of Environmental Science section of ‘Indian Science Congress 2020’.
Vikram S. Negi is working as a Scientist ‘E’ at Center for Biodiversity Conservation and Management (CBCM), G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment (GBP-NIHE), Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand. He received his Doctor of Philosophy degree from H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal). His field of specialization includes Forest Ecology, Phytosociology and Long-term ecological monitoring of plant biodiversity. He has published 120 research papers, chapters in edited books/ proceedings, scientific popular articles, and manuals/ monographs. He has been conferred with Young Scientist Awards (in 2010, 2011, 2012) for significant R&D works. In addition, he has been awarded as a Fellow in Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and DST Fast Track Young Scientist in 2014, and 106th Indian Science Congress in 2019.
Indra D. Bhatt, M.Sc., Ph.D. in Plant Science has over 20 years of research experience in different position and currently holding Scientist F and Head Centre for Biodiversity Conservation and Management at GBPNIHE, Almora. He has wide experience of working with multidisciplinary, multinational team of scientists and currently working as Lead author for Cross Chapter paper on “Mountain” and Chapter 5 – “Food, fiber and ecosystem products”, IPCC working group II – Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. He is a member of Commission of Ecosystem Management of IUCN and was an elected ‘Sectional President’ of Environmental Science Section of 106th Indian Science Congress 2019. He has published over 120 research papers having over 3700 citation and 32 h index. His work is largely focused on conservation and sustainable use of Himalayan biodiversity.
Journal of Graphic Era University, Vol. 9_1, 55–82.
doi: 10.13052/jgeu0975-1416.914
© 2021 River Publishers
2 SWOT Assessment of IHR Biodiversity
3 Addressing Weaknesses and Threats-conserve Biodiversity
4 Building on Strengths & Opportunities – Sustainably Use of Biodiversity
4.1 Carbon Pools Sequestration
4.2 Restoration of Degraded/Forest Land
4.3 Medicinal Plants (MPs) – Emerging Options
4.4 Wild Edibles as Source of Food and Nutrition Security
4.5 Indigenous Knowledge and Practices-rich Agro-biodiversity
4.6 Strong Conservation Area Coverage
4.7 Unique Genes for Posterity