The Impact of Positivity in Multi Business Model Innovation in a World of VUCA – How Can Positive Emotions Stimulate the MBMI Process?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/nbjict1902-097X.2024.002

Keywords:

Positivity, multi business model innovation (MBMI) process, volatile uncertainty complex ambiguous (VUCA)

Abstract

The importance of right speed, effectiveness, efficiency and learning in Multi Business Model Innovation (MBMI) is vital to meet today’s Volatile, Uncertainty, Complex and Ambiguous (VUCA) challenges to survive as a Business in Business Model EcosystemS (BMES). Coronavirus pandemic, war in Ukraine, volatile global material and resource prices and deliveries, cyberattacks make big external VUCA events to Businesses. VUCA can also come from the inside of the Business as management style change, interventions or a burn down of the Business.

How can Businesses under these VUCA conditions still do high quality MBMI? How can MBMI participants and teams in these processes increase their MBMI output?

This paper investigates the impact of positive emotions, relatedness and creativity on the outcome of three different MBMI processes in three different Business Model Ecosystems influenced by VUCA. Positivity, relatedness and creativity are hypothesized as components to strengthen the individuals’ search for meaning in VUCA and for their motivation to act in MBMI processes influenced by VUCA.

The study is conducted as a mix method research project in the view of MBMI and psychological theory – particularly the concept of positive emotions and relatedness as mental states for learning and knowledge creation. Interviews and observations show that individuals in networks and teams with a mood of positivity strengthen MBMI and the MBMI learning and creation process. Thus, our intention for further research is twofold: Training in positivity in teams can stimulate the courage to make disruptive solutions sufficient for VUCA. Secondly, in searching for the MBMI mindset psychological traits will be studied by the Big Five profile test. This opens for recruitment of participants to optimizing MBMI teams. Main contributions are:

• Positive emotions and relatedness strengthen the urge to learn and to create in VUCA – searching for meaning and motivation to act is related to this concept.

• Learning and creative processes increase, since the basis of positivity and relatedness in individuals, teams and networks are strengthened.

• Innovative outcome seems of a higher quality when based on positive emotions. Research in positive emotions in Business Model Innovation is rare.

• Positive emotion is the core concept and by training of positivity, it may strengthen the MBMI processes and the VUCA competences.

• The outcomes and solution of the MBMI processes in the case study show mainly incremental and radical MBMI – only one is disruptive.

Author Biographies

Jane Flarup, CTIF Global Capsule, Kuttervej 13, DK-9990 Skagen Denmark

Jane Flarup has been Associate Professor at Aarhus University and is a member of CTIF Global Capsule (CGC) research group. Since 2018, she has been a researcher on the CGC Greenbizz project and she has published papers for conferences and journals on psychological topics in business and engineering since 2013. She is also the author of books and articles on organizational storytelling and cultural change. She has been head of Business Engineering Studies at Aarhus School of Engineering, Aarhus University. She has an entrepreneurial and interdisciplinary approach to research. Her main interest is positive psychology and gratitude as mental tools in Multi Business Model Innovation and how to apply psychological topics to business model and technology innovation in interdisciplinary networks, multi business model typologies, sensing, persuasive and virtual business models. She studied in Paris for a year at l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (l’EHESS) on a scholarship from the French state and she has worked as a business journalist at the largest Danish newspaper, Jyllands-Posten. She is Master of Arts in comparative literature and positive psychology from Aarhus University.

Peter Lindgren, CTIF Global Capsule, Kuttervej 13, DK-9990 Skagen Denmark

Peter Lindgren Peter Lindgren hold a full Professorship in Multi business model and Technology innovation at Aarhus University, Denmark – Business development and technology innovation and is Vice President of CTIF Global Capsule (CGC). He was Director of CTIF Global Capsule/MBIT Research Centre at Aarhus University – Business Development and Technology and was member of Research Committee at Aarhus University – BSS.

He has researched and worked with network based high-speed innovation since 2000. He has been head of Studies for Master in Engineering – Business Development and Technology at Aarhus University from 2014–2016 and member of the management group at Aarhus University BTECH 2014–2018. He has been researcher at Politechnico di Milano in Italy (2002/03), Stanford University, USA (2010/11), University Tor Vergata, Italy (2016/2017) and has in the period 2007–2011 been the founder and Centre Manager of International Centre for Innovation www.ici.aau.dk at Aalborg University, founder of the MBIT research group and lab – http://btech.au.dk/forskning/mbit/ – and is cofounder of CTIF Global Capsule – www.ctifglobalcapsule.org.

He has worked as researcher in many different multi business model and technology innovations projects and knowledge networks among others E100 – http://www.entovation.com/kleadmap/, Stanford University project Peace Innovation Lab http://captology.stanford.edu/projects/peace-innovation.html, The Nordic Women in business project – www.womeninbusiness.dk/, The Centre for TeleInFrastruktur (CTIF), FP7 project about “multi business model innovation in the clouds” – www.Neffics.eu, EU Kask project – www.Biogas2020.se, Central Project, Motor5G, Recombine, Greenbizz, SIRR. He is cofounder of five startup businesses amongst others – www.thebeebusiness.com the www.thedigibusiness.com and www.vdmbee.com.

He is author to several articles and books about business model innovation in networks and Emerging Business Models. He has an entrepreneurial and interdisciplinary approach to research. His research interests are multi business model and technology innovation in interdisciplinary networks, multi business model typologies, sensing-, persuasive- and virtual- business models. He has been serving as quest editor and reviewer for many highly respected journals and conferences.

References

Akgün, A.E., Erdil O., Keskin H. and Muceldilli B., (2016) “The relationship among gratitude, hope, connections, and innovativeness”, The Service industries journal. Vol.36 (3–4), pp. 102–123.

Andersen, G.K., Flarup J., and Lindgren, P. (2018) “Business Model Innovation Coaching in a Three-Dimensional Continuum”, Global Wireless Summit. Chiang Rai, Thailand, Thailand: IEEE Xplore.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Bashir, M. and Farooq, R. (2019). The synergetic effect of knowledge management and Business model innovation on firm competence: A systematic review May 2019 International Journal of Innovation Science 11(1) DOI: 10.1108/IJIS-10-2018-0103.

Baumeister, R.B., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., and Vohs, K. D., (2001), “Bad Is Stronger Than Good”, Review of General Psychology, vol. 5, pp. 323–370.

Bocken N. M. P. and Geradts, T. H. J. (2020) Barriers and drivers to sustainable Business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities Long Range Planning Volume 53, Issue 4, August 2020, 101950.

Bodenhausen, G. V. and Peery, D. (2009-03-01). “Social Categorization and Stereotyping In vivo: The VUCA Challenge”. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 3 (2): 133–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00167.x. ISSN 1751-9004.

Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-Opetition: A Revolution Mindset That Combines Competition and Cooperation ISBN 0-385-47950-6.

Bryman, A. and Bell, W. (2011) “Business Research Methods”. Oxford University Press.

Bujok Patrick, Frans Bjørn-Thygesen and George Xydis (2021) Developing a sustainable energy strategy for Midtjyllands Airport, Denmark International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2022.2029632.

Chevalier, J.M. and Buckles, D.J. (2013) Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry, Routledge UK. ISBN 978-0415540315.

Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: The new psychology of success. London: Robinson, an imprint of Little, Brown Book Group, 2017.

ECSMV (2022) https://ecsmv.dk/.

Fine, C. H. (1999) Clockspeed : Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage Perseus Books, Massachusetts.

Flarup, J., (2018) “Tak er ikke kun et fattigt ord. Aktionsforskningsprojekt om taknemmelighed med maskiningeniørstuderende på Aarhus School of Engineering” (“Thank you is not just a poor word. An Action Research Project on Mechanical Engineering Students at Aarhus School of Engineering”). Unpublished thesis. Aarhus University, Denmark.

Fredrickson, B. L., (1998) “What good are positive emotions?”, Review of General Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 300–319.

Fredrickson, B. L., (2001) “The Role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions”, American Psychologist, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 218–226.

Fredrickson, B. L., (2004) “The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, Vol. 359, No. 1449, pp. 1367–1377.

Fredrickson B.L. (2009), “Positivity”, Harmony Books, New York.

Fredrickson, B. L., (2013) “Love 2.0: Finding Happiness and Health in Moments of Connection”, Plume Books, New York.

Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B. L., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., and Penn, D. L., (2010) “Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology”, Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 849–864.

George, Bill (2017) https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2017/02/17/vuca-2-0-a-strategy-for-steady-leadership-in-an-unsteady-world/?sh=3c0d9d8c13d8.

George, Bill (2021) https://nbaa.org/news/Business-aviation-insider/2021-jan-feb/vuca-2-0-leadership-solution-using-vision-adaptability-succeed/.

Graziotin D, Wang X., and Abrahamsson P., (2014) “Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineering”, PeerJ, Vol. 2, pp. e289–e289. San Francisco, CA.

Greenbizz (2022) – www.greenbizz.eu.

Horstmeyer, A. (2019), “How VUCA is changing the learning landscape – and how curiosity can help”, Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-09-2018-0119.

Håkonson, H. and Snehota, I. (1989) No Business is an island: The network concept of Business strategy Scandinavian Journal of Management Volume 5, Issue 3, 1989, Pages 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(89)90026-2.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222.

Knoop, H. H. (2010). Education in 2025: How Positive Psychology can re-vitalize education. In Donaldson, S., Csikszentmihályi, M. and Nakamura, J. (Eds.). Applied Positive Psychology: Improving Everyday Life, Schools, Work, Health, and Society. New York: Routledge.

Knoop, H. H. (2013). Positive Education, or just Education. In Proctor, C. and Linley, P. A. (Eds.). Research, Application at Interventions for Children and Adolescents – A Positive Psychology Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.

Knoop, H. H. (2016). The Eudemonics of Education. In Vittersø, J. (ed.) Handbook of Eudaimonic Wellbeing. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.

Lindgren, P. and Rasmussen O.H., (2013) “The Business Model Cube”, Journal of Multi Business Model Innovation and Technology, Vol. 1.

Lee, H.L. et al., (2016) Technological disruption and innovation in last-mile delivery. Stanford Business, (June), pp. 1–26. Available at: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/gsb/files/publication-pdf/vcii-publicationtechnological-disruption-innovation-last-mile-delivery.pdf.

Lindgren, P., (2016) “The Business Model Eco System”, Journal of Multi Business Model Innovation and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 1–50.

Lindgren P., (2017) Network Based High Speed Product Development River Publishers Series in Multi Business Model Innovation, Technologies and Sustainable Business ISBN 8793519273.

Lindgren P., (2018) Disruptive, Radical and Incremental Multi Business Model Innovation Global Wireless Summit (GWS) DOI: 10.1109/GWS.2018.8686679 Corpus ID: 115195857.

Lindgren, P., (2018) “The Multi Business Model Innovation Approach: Part 1 The Multi Business Model Approach”, in River Publishers Series in Multi Business Model Innovation, Technologies and Sustainable Business, ed. P. Lindgren and A. Aagaard, Vol. 244, River Publishers Lange Geer 44 2611 PW Delft, The Netherlands.

Lindgren, P., et al., (2018) “Developing Multi Business Model Innovation Competence and Environments – an Experiment in 8 Nordic Businesses”, IFKAD 2018, Delft, Netherlands, 4–6 July 2018.

Lindgren, P., and Rasmussen, O. H. (2018) The Business model relation axiom. In: River Publishers Series in Multi Business Model Innovation, Technologies and Sustainable Business (eds), The Multi Business Model Innovation Approach Part 1, pp. 119–147.

Lindgren, P. (2021) The Green Multi Business Model Innovation Brain Journal of Mobile Multimedia, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-8706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13052/jmm1550-4646.17132.

Lindgren P. (2022) 6G Technologies – How Can It Help Future Green Business Model Innovation Journal of ICT Standardization, Vol. 10_1, 11–38. doi: 10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1012, River Publishers.

Lorenzo, M., Tucci, C. L. and Afuah, A. (2017) a critical assessment of Business model research Academy of Management Annals 2017, Vol. 11, No. 1, 73–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072.

Malhotra, Y. (2000) Knowledge Management and New Organization Forms: A Framework for Business Model Innovation. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(1), 5–14, January–March, 2000.

Malhotra Y. (2001) Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation DOI: 10.4018/978-1-878289-98-8 ISBN 13: 9781878289988.

Markides C. and Charitou, C. D. (2004) Competing with dual Business models: A contingency approach Academy of Management Executive 2004 Volume 18, No. 3.

Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., and Urbina, S. (1996). “Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns”. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101.

Pangaribuan, C. P., Husseini Wijaya, F. H., Djamil, A. B., Hidayat, D., and Putra, O. P. B. (2020) “An analysis on the importance of motivation to transfer learning in VUCA environments”, Management Science Letters, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 271–278.

Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C. and Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019) Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches Journal of Cleaner Production Volume 215, 1 April 2019, Pages 198–216.

Prasad, R. (2016) Knowledge home. 2016 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), IEEE Explorer.

Psychometrics 2022 “What is psychometrics? | Psychometric Society”. www.psychometricsociety.org. Retrieved 2022-29-12.

Ryan, R., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

Ryan, R. and Deci. E.L. (2017). Self Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford Press.

Schick, A., Hobson, P. R. and Ibisch, P. L. (2017). “Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem-based approach”. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability. Vol. 3(4): e01267. doi:10.1002/ehs2.1267. ISSN 2332-8878.

Scott, S. V., and Walsham, G. (2005). Reconceptualizing and managing reputation risk in the knowledge economy: Toward reputable action. Organization Science, 16(3), 308–322.

Seligman, M. E. P., and Maier, S. F. (1967), Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(1), 1–9.

Seligman, M. E. P. and Peterson, C., (2004) “Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification”, Oxford University Press, New York.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2012), “Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being”, Free Press, New York.

Shoaakazemi, M., Momeni, J. M., Keramati, R., Ebrahimi. T. F. and Tazekand, F., (2013) “The relationship between happiness, meta cognitive skills (self-regulation, problemsolving) and academic achievement of students in Tehran”, Life Science Journal, Vol. 10.

Shuhayl A. and Manoj, J. (205), The VUCA Company,. Mumbai, Jaico Publishing House, p. 283. ‘350.00. (Paperback). ISBN 13 – 978 – 81 – 8495.

University, Aarhus. The CGC Research Centre. 2019 [cited 2020 28 marts]; CGC Research centre presentation]. Available from: https://btech.au.dk/forskning/forskningssektioner-og-centre/cgc-au/?tx_pure_pi%5Bpointer%5D=5andtx_pure_pi%5BshowAll%5D=falseandcHash=43d447d83abd79fe676844c1ddd7d9d0.

Valter, P. (2018), “Engineering setup and Laboratory Experiments”, Novelty of Laboratory Measurement Tools in Multi Business Model Innovation, Department of Business Development and Technology (BTECH), Aarhus University, Denmark. p. 120.

Walker, B. R. and Jackson, C. J. (2014). “How the Five Factor Model and revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory predict divergent thinking”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 57, pp. 54–58.

Warren B., and Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge New York : Harper & Row.

Wolf, D. (2007). Prepared and Resolved: The Strategic Agenda for Growth, Performance and Change. dsb Publishing. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-9791300-0-7.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-07

How to Cite

Flarup, J., & Lindgren, P. (2024). The Impact of Positivity in Multi Business Model Innovation in a World of VUCA – How Can Positive Emotions Stimulate the MBMI Process?. Nordic and Baltic Journal of Information & Communications Technologies, 2024, 25–60. https://doi.org/10.13052/nbjict1902-097X.2024.002

Issue

Section

Articles