Activities and Outputs from SME and MNC Collaboration on R&I Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/nbjict1902-097X.2023.003Keywords:
R&I, research and innovation, collaboration, SME, small and medium enterprise, MNC, multi national corporation, 5G, agile methodology, business ecosystem, open innovationAbstract
The fifth generation (5G) of telecommunication systems is creating new business opportunities for many industry verticals. Managing the innovation process is risky and calls for collaboration with various ecosystem stakeholders to meet the demands of technology, business, and customers. This article investigates the activities and output of participation in collaborative research and innovation (R&I) activities for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) and Multi National Corporations (MNCs) and how they engage with such activities. A survey was conducted with a non-random sample of 42 respondents involved in R&I projects and further supplemented with three in-depth interviews of a subset of the survey respondents. Our key findings indicate that SMEs benefit from technology-related activities and access to decision makers in MNCs. Heavy-handed bureaucracy in projects is a friction point for SMEs, which prefer development speed over scheduled reports and deliverables. In contrast, MNCs benefit from business-related activities by advertising technology to clients, suppliers, and downstream business models. Suggested improvements include additional client needs assessments, trialing of technology and service concepts, and dissemination of the results of R&I activities. SMEs and MNCs view establishing relationships with other partners as valuable for accessing key competencies and vertical industry ecosystems. Our findings provide novel insight in the collaboration of R&I projects with SMEs and MNCs and contributes to the business ecosystem and open innovation literature. Further research should include follow-up studies of the SME–MNC collaboration towards commercialization of innovative 5G use cases.
References
E.-C. Consortium., “Eu-citizen.science: D2.2: Engagement and community building plan,” 2019.
G. PPP, “5g empowering vertical industries.” https://5g-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/5GPPP-VerticalsWhitePaper-2020-Final.pdf. 2020.
K. Campbell, L. Cruz, B. Flanagan, B. Morelli, B. O’Neil, S. Téral, and J. Watson, “The 5G Economy – How 5G will contribute to the global economy,” 2019.
H. W. Chesbrough, “The era of open innovation,” Mit Sloan Management Review, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 35–41, 2003.
H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations,” Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–123, 2000.
K. Opsahl, “The usage of lean startup-methodology in the context of helix innovation models,” 2021.
E. Ries, The lean startup : how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business, 1st ed., 2011.
E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell, and E. Grigoroudis, “Helix trilogy: the triple, quadruple, and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy, and practice set of perspectives,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2021.
S. Prashantham and J. Birkinshaw, “Dancing with gorillas: How small companies can partner effectively with mncs,” California Management Review, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 6–23, 2008.
“About – 5G Solutions Project.” https://5gsolutionsproject.eu/about/.
H. W. Chesbrough, Open innovation : the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
L. F. Mesquita and S. G. Lazzarini, “Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: implications for smes’ access to global markets,” 2008.
E. Commision, “European Innovation Scoreboard 2022 – Annex B Performance per indicator.” https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-09/ec_rtd_eis-2022-annex-b.pdf, 2022.
B. European Commision, “European Innovation Scoreboard 2022 – Methodology Report.” https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-09/ec_rtd_eis-2022-methodology-report.pdf, 2022.
A. Ørding Olsen, “Coordinated exploration for grand challenges,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 6, pp. 2232–2255, 2016.
D. Sabando-Vera, M. Yonfa-Medranda, N. Montalván-Burbano, J. Albors-Garrigos, and K. Parrales-Guerrero, “Worldwide research on open innovation in smes,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, vol. 8, p. 20, Jan. 2022.
A. Spithoven, W. Vanhaverbeke, and N. Roijakkers, “Open innovation practices in smes and large enterprises,” 2013.
A. Radziwon and M. Bogers, “Open innovation in smes: Exploring interorganizational relationships in an ecosystem,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 146, pp. 573–587, 2019.
C. Grimpe, W. Sofka, and A. P. Distel, “SME participation in research grant consortia—the emergence of coordinated attention in collaborative innovation,” Small Business Economics, vol. 59, pp. 1567–1592, Dec. 2022.
T. Reve, “Arbeidsplassene skapes i de nye vekstbedriftene,” Sluttrapport fra MIT Reap South West Norway project. Handelshøyskolen BI. Program/virkemiddelapparatet, 2017.
H. Chesbrough, “How smaller companies can benefit from open innovation,” JAPAN SPOTLIGHT, no. Jan/Feb 2010, 2010.
Q. Zhang and W. Doll, “The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: A causal model,” European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 4, pp. 95–112, 2001.
E. Ries, The startup way : how modern companies use entrepreneurial management to transform culture and drive long-term growth. Place of publication not identified: Portfolio Penguin, 2017.
R. Cooper, “Perspective: The stage-gate®
idea-to-launch process—update, what’s new, and nexgen systems*,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 25, pp. 213–232, 2008.
R. Cooper, “Agile–stage-gate hybrids,” Research Technology Management, vol. 59, pp. 21–29, 2016.
R. Cooper, “Idea-to-launch gating systems,” Research Technology Management, vol. 60, pp. 48–52, 2017.
K. Still, “Accelerating research innovation by adopting the lean startup paradigm,” Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 32–43, 2017.
A. Gawer and M. Cusumano, “Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, pp. 417–433, May 2014.
H. Hallingby and V. Do, “Adaption of ecosystem analysis to sim and id management,” Telenor Research Report No. 9, 2013.
A. Tiwana, Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann, 2014.
A. Gawer, “Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework,” Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1239–1249, 2014.
S. Makinen and O. Dedehayir, “Business ecosystem evolution and strategic considerations: A literature review,” in Proceedings of ICE 2012, 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, pp. 1–10, June 2012.
M. Franco, “Performance in strategic alliances: An analysis of objective and subjective measures,” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, vol. 3, pp. 84– 100, Jan. 2011.
M. Iansiti and R. Levien, “Strategy as ecology,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 82, pp. 68–78, 126, Apr. 2004.
M. Peltoniemi and E. Vuori, “Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments,” Proceedings of EBusiness Research Forum, July 2008.
R. K. Yin, Case study research : design and methods. Applied social research methods series v. 5, Los Angeles: SAGE, 5th ed., 2014.
A. Bryman and E. Bell, Business Research Methods. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
M. Xie, P. Boleguin, P.-J. Nesse, and H. Lonsethagen, “D1.4B Methodologies for the validation of 5G and for LL measurements (v2.0),” Jan. 2021.
P. Nesse, H. Hallingby, L. Briguglio, and I. Markopoulos, “Validation of 5G use case solutions – Simultaneous assessment of business value and social acceptance in early stages of the research and innovation projects,” Nordic and Baltic journal of Information and Communications technologies, vol. Forthcoming, 2023.
L. Briguglio, P. Nesse, A. D. Giglio, C. Occhipinti, P. Durkin, and P. Markopoulos, “Business Value and Social Acceptance for the Validation of 5G Technology,” IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communications and Networking (MeditCom), 2021.
A. Edmondson, “Strategies of learning from failure,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, pp. 48–55, 137, 2011.
S. Prashantham and J. Birkinshaw, “MNE-SME cooperation: An integrative framework,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1161–1175, 2020.
P. Durkin, S. Fletcher, A. Gavras, H. K. Hallingby, and I. Mesogiti, “Business Validation in 5G PPP vertical use cases,” 5G Infrastructure Association; Vision and Societal Challenges Working Group; Business Validation, Models, and Ecosystems Sub-Group, Apr. 2020.
I. Calzada, “Democratising smart cities? penta-helix multistakeholder social innovation framework,” Smart Cities, vol. 3, pp. 1145–1172, 2020.
M. Steinmo and E. Rasmussen, “How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1250–1259, 2016.
J. Vik, A. M. Melås, E. P. Stræte, and R. A. Søraa, “Balanced readiness level assessment (brla): A tool for exploring new and emerging technologies.,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 169, p. 120854, 2021.
I. Georgieva, E. Beaunoyer, and M. J. Guitton, “Ensuring social acceptability of technological tracking in the covid-19 context,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 116, p. 106639, 2021.
V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.,” MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.
